BHSEC RESULT EVALUATION

Top 10: Average of best 4 subjects including English

  • Pema Dema: 75.25 %:  ENG64.0, ACC 76.0, COM 83.0, BMT 78.0
  • Deki: 70.5 %:  ENG 62.0, ACC 72.0, COM 74.0, ECO 74.0
  • Namgay Rinzin: 69.0 %:  ENG 60.0, CHE 69.0, MAT 83.0, BIO 64.0
  • Tharpola: 68.25 %:  ENG 62.0, DZO 69.0, CHE 66.0, MAT 76.0
  • Tashi Phuntsho: 68.25 %:  ENG 52.0, PHY 66.0, CHE 69.0, MAT 86.0
  • Gupta Mani Rai: 67.0 %: ENG 69.0, DZO 58.0, MAT 72.0, CTS 69.0
  • Tshering Lhamo: 65.5 %:  ENG 66.0, DZO 72.0, CHE 66.0, BIO 58.0
  • Bishnu Maya: 65.0 %:  ENG 62.0, COM 62.0, BMT 72.0, ECO 64.0
  • Jamyang Peldon: 63.5 %:  ENG 52.0, ACC 78.0, COM 62.0, BMT 62.0
  • Chimi Dem: 61.75 %:  ENG 62.0, DZO 55.0, COM 78.0, ECO 52.0
Repeater Improvements Most of the repeaters who joined Pelkhil achieved a marked improvement over their 2011 BHSEC results. This is clear proof that with personal effort, Pelkhil provides the right conditions to achieve academic excellence. Below are our repeaters’ 2012 results followed by their 2011 results from their previous schools.
  • Deki: 70.5 % :  59%
  • Namgay Rinzin: 69.0 % : 60.75%
  • Tharpola: 68.25 % :  55%
  • Tashi Phuntsho: 68.25 % :  54.4%
  • Gupta Mani Rai: 67.0 % : 53.75%
  • Tshering Lhamo: 65.5 % :  52.8
  • Jamyang Peldon: 63.5 % :  55%
  • Rinzin Dorji:  57.75%  : 48.5%
  • Kumbu Tshewang: 55.25% :47.5%
  • Jamyang Tashi B: 48.5%  : 42.75%

High Scores by subject

  • ENG: 72.0 by Sonam Chuki Tshering
  • DZO:  72.0 by Tshering Lhamo
  • PHY: 66.0 by Tashi Phuntsho
  • CHE: 69.0 by Namgay Rinzin
  • MAT: 86.0 by Tashi Phuntsho
  • BIO: 64.0 by Namgay Rinzin
  • CTS: 72.0 by Pema Dema
  • ACC: 78.0 by Jamyang Peldon
  • COM: 83.0 by Pema Dema
  • BMT: 78.0 by Pema Dema
  • ECO: 74.0 by Deki
  • GEO: 72.0 by Yeshi Dema

Our congratulations go out to all our successful candidates. Our heartfelt commiserations to those who did not make it this time.  In our analysis it is absolutely clear that the difference between those who made and those who did not make it was simply a difference of effort put in. Barring one, all of the unsuccessful candidates were from the school’s academic watch list.

Comments are closed.